您现在的位置: Language Tips> Audio & Video> Special Speed News  
   
 





 
New proposals intensify debate on net neutrality
[ 2009-09-25 17:34 ]

 

The head of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission wants to strengthen the push for equal access on the Internet. Some companies oppose what they see as government interference.

This is the VOA Special English Economics Report.

"Information wants to be free," the saying goes. But the debate over net neutrality could define how free the exchange of information is going to be in the future.

Net neutrality is the idea that everything on the Internet should be treated equally. That sounds simple. But the issue is a complex mix of technical, business, political and legal questions.

New proposals intensify debate on net neutrality

In the United States, communication law is enforced by the Federal Communications Commission. Since 2005, the F.C.C. has used four policy principles to guide its enforcement in cases related to the Internet.

The policy statement says consumers must be able to get the lawful content, applications and services of their choice. Users must be able to connect their choice of devices that are legal and do not harm the network. Another principle supports competition.

This week, in a speech, F.C.C. Chairman Julius Genachowski proposed two more. One would say Internet providers could not discriminate against content or applications. The other would require they explain how they manage their networks.

The F.C.C. chairman also wants to extend all six principles to wireless carriers now that their phones access the Internet. And he wants to make the principles into rules. Next month he will seek to begin the process, which starts with collecting public comment.

The new proposals have roots in disputes involving two companies. In 2007, Verizon refused to make it easier for an abortion rights group to send text messages to its supporters. Verizon said it did not accept programs on issues like abortion or war, but it quickly changed its decision.

And last year, a divided F.C.C. ruled against Comcast for interfering with traffic to a lawful music and video sharing site. At first, Comcast denied it, but then defended its actions as "reasonable network management." Critics said Comcast was trying to block competition with its cable video programming.

Chairman Genachowski says a "free and open Internet" must be safeguarded. But providers say they sometimes have to block sites to prevent abuse. And a big wireless carrier, AT&T, calls extending the net neutrality policy "a risky experiment" with American investment in high-speed Internet.

There is also debate about the desire of some Internet providers to offer special treatment to sites willing to pay for it. That goes against the custom of treating all sites neutrally.

And that's the VOA Special English Economics Report, written by Mario Ritter.

Related stories:

调查:美国年轻人互联网使用率不及他国

The many sounds of college radio

手机私语“扰民” 美国影院欲设干扰

南非:飞鸽传信比网络快!

(Source: VOA 英语点津编辑)

英语点津版权说明:凡注明来源为“英语点津:XXX(署名)”的原创作品,除与中国日报网签署英语点津内容授权协议的网站外,其他任何网站或单位未经允许不得非法盗链、转载和使用,违者必究。如需使用,请与010-84883631联系;凡本网注明“来源:XXX(非英语点津)”的作品,均转载自其它媒体,目的在于传播更多信息,其他媒体如需转载,请与稿件来源方联系,如产生任何问题与本网无关;本网所发布的歌曲、电影片段,版权归原作者所有,仅供学习与研究,如果侵权,请提供版权证明,以便尽快删除。
相关文章 Related Story
 
 
 
本频道最新推荐
 
New Subway line to accelerate Beijing life
No Promises
音像制品 audio-visual product
创业板“市盈率” PE ratio
调查:多数职员不提醒上司难堪事
翻吧推荐
 
论坛热贴
 
翻译达人评选,快来投票!
经典英语口语,不得不看(推荐)
I chocolate you!怎么翻译?
请教obama演讲里的一句话
 
晒晒小D机器人暴强的翻译